Is this a bear market? Are we in a recession? Let’s assume everyone can finally agree on those points. In that case, nobody should be looking for a bottom for at least another two years.
This is not 1987, nor 1998, nor 2004. Those short-term corrections did not entail full-blown global recessions and debt liquidations. They were mere technical blips, statistical noise to anyone but short-term traders. Today, with the credit markets frozen, home prices down worldwide, unemployment taking off, weekly bank failures, and corporate bankruptcies left and right, we can be pretty sure that there are some real reasons for the global decline in stock prices.
Historical precedents
The aftermath of a society-wide credit binge and speculative mania across all asset classes is best compared to the Great Depression of the 1930s, the earlier depression of the 1830s and ’40s, or the bursting of the South Seas and Mississippi bubbles in the early 1700s. Those respective bear markets lasted roughly 3, 6 and 60 years, so given the circumstances, we should hope for another quick and dirty depression like the 1930s. The most recent run-of-the-mill bear market, the dot-com bust, lasted from March 2000 to October 2002, a mere 31 months, and it was associated with only the mildest of recessions. Prior to that, we had the entire recession-filled period from 1966 to 1982, when the Dow swung wildly in a range for 16 years while inflation raged, resulting in a 75% real loss.
If you measure its age from the nominal peak, the current bear is all of 11 months old, an adolescent or young adult. I actually prefer to think of this as just the next phase down in the bear that started in 2000, since if you measure your assets in gold or a basket of currencies, US stocks never came close to regaining those highs. But then, I think the West is in for a long decline in standard of living, so even 8 years is early in this bear. It takes generations for a society to relearn the lessons of prudence, personal responsibility and laissez-faire that are necessary for sustained growth. Just ask the Chinese.
Here’s a century of the Dow in gold. Look like a bottom yet?
Click chart for sharper view. Source: chartsrus.com
Panic, hope, repeat
On a month-to-month scale, bear markets alternate between periods of panic and hope, appearing on a chart as a series of waterfalls and dead-cat bounces. We have been through two of each since October 2007, and the bounce out of the July lows appears to be rolling over, likely into the deepest sell-off yet (Dow 9000 by Christmas?). Early in the game as it is, after this plunge to new lows, the bottom-callers will emerge and the shorts will scramble to cover, and we could have a mighty rally, maybe 25% over several months, which would just serve to further demoralize buyers during the next leg down.
Real bottoms are lonely
When the bottom-calling stops and the market doesn’t snap back up from a plunge, but just drifts along in a climate of disgust with little volume or public interest, it will be time to think about going long again.
I have been saying for some years that we would once again reach a point where one ounce of gold will purchase the entire Dow. It happened in 1932, and again in 1980. The only unanswered question is, at what price will they converge?
$8,000? $5,000? $3,000? Who knows. But the Dow has a long way to go down, and gold has a long way to go up.
Totally agree.
The longer gold lingers below 1000, the lower the nominal Dow will go. Adjusted for inflation, the Dow 800 of 1982 would be about 2500 today. Why is it crazy to think it could go that low again? Dow 40 of 1932 would be like 800-1200 today.
Stocks are equity, and as we have seen lately, equity can go POOF when heavy leverage is involved.